##ymbolic Symbols In Alice Walkers Everyday Use

In Alice Walker’s short story â€Å"Everyday Use† the author uses symbolic objects to represent something larger than what it may seem which becomes a shortcut to the overall theme of the story. Both the daughters and mama each have different views on what the symbolic meaning is. The narrator who is also known as Mama tells the story which has to do with the identity and ancestry. The symbolic item in this story are the hand-stitched quilts, and the story takes off when the daughter, Dee, sees the hand-stitched quilts to be something that is fashionable and not as something that should be seen as very valuable. The quilts are known to be very unique and seen as authentic art. Many critics have analyzed the story focusing on different areas of†¦show more content†¦Ã¢â‚¬Å"I can ‘member Grandma Dee without the quilts† is what Maggie says to her sister, which shows Maggie’s value of family. Both critics believe the ongoing tradition of quilting must be represented through the generations of quilting and the background history or it all. Where the quilt came from is the most important value. The quilts contains passed down stories whereas they form a link between the generations (Weidmann 260). The quilts are intended to form the value of heritage. An item that is valuable is seen as something of great worth and something that has meaning. In the story the daughter Dee accuses her mother and sister as being â€Å"backward enough to put them to everyday use† (153). Sam Whitsitt goes on to say that Dee herself doe not know they system of values herself and does not understand the value behind the quilts as the mother and daughter Maggie does (456). The quilt is meant to be a representation of value through things that do not get sold or wander of, they are meant to stay in the house to hold their value, but the daughter Dee saw the quilts as a commodity rather than what they should really be seen for (Whitsitt, 455). David Cowart, who sees the same concept as Whitsitt states the quits represent a heritage the daughter Dee cannot understand because she already discarded it (179). The overall tradition of quilting is meant to be a preservation of the true heritage (Cowart, 183). The quilts are seen as things

Is Trump Thinking Straight - 1305 Words

Is Trump Thinking Straight? The U.S. economy today is not topnotch from a U.S. American’s viewpoint. People blame it on the laws, the economy, other countries, or even themselves and there is an endless list that can be made. One of the problems that have been trialed before us by the Republican politician, Donald Trump, is the population of illegal immigrants in the United States. He believes if we deport all illegal immigrants that our countries crimes will decrease incredibly and that our nation will be strong once again (Timm). As I first heard about this argument I agreed with Trump, but after researching all the plans he has made, and his actions he thinks are â€Å"smart†, I’m not sure I would agree with this aggressive, conceited politician. This topic has been a debate for many years, but now Trump has made huge plans for the situation. He plans to build a wall or type of fence along the southern part of the border. Not only that, but he plans for Mexico to pay for it, which is a very brand new plan we have heard about (Deb). My question is how does he plan to make Mexico follow with this idea? There has already been given proof that the president of Mexico will not agree with this method (Wilstein). â€Å"Of course it’s false. It reflects an enormous ignorance for what Mexico represents,† stated Eduardo Sanchez, a spokesperson for the Mexican President (Wilstein). So if we decide to build this wall, it will have to come out of our countries’ pocket, which is already empty ofShow MoreRelatedBernard Goldberg s Bias : A Cbs Insider Exposes How The Media Distort The News955 Words   |  4 Pagessupposed to be a straight news story about a legitimate candidate running for president of the United States .† Goldberg’s statement is true today with running candidate Donald Trump. There is a lot of negative views on Trump but for reporters to place their own opinion on him when reporting the news is not right. Newscasters are to report in a straight objective way and inserting their views on the candidate is not being objective. No matter what the public is thinking about Trump, the reporters shouldRead MoreWho Don t Take Everything?1260 Words   |  6 Pageseven a news anchor who spread common ideologies without questioning their validity. However, in every society, there are those who don’t take everything they hear to be true. These people, known as thinkers, question familiar beliefs and provoke thinking in a new light. Born of humble beginnings, Socrates was one of those thinkers and thought differently than most. Most of his life was spent fearlessly questioning the told truth and provoking new wisdom in others. A man studied by so many, SocratesRead MoreJohn F. Kennedy s Anti Rhetoric1388 Words   |  6 Pagesovershadowed anything in recent history,† with Eisenhower — â€Å"conventional in mind, relatively inarticulate.† The John F. Kennedy presidency, with its glittering court of Camelot, cemented the impression that it was the Democrats who represented the thinking men and women of America. Rather than run away from the anti-intellectual label, Republicans embraced it for their own political purposes. In his â€Å"time for choosing† speech, Ronald Reagan said that the issue in the 1964 election was â€Å"whether we believeRead MoreTheu.s. Obama And Donald Trump1339 Words   |  6 Pageshave been pleading to keep immigrants out of America and would be head over heels at the idea of â€Å"building a wall†. It is interesting to compare the clashing viewpoints of Americans throughout history to the debates between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump today. Daniel Tichenor’s Dividing Lines illustrates how throughout our history, Americans have remained ambivalent towards immigration. Since the 19th century, nativists and pro immigration reformers have gone head to head to fight over immigrationRead MoreThe Errors And Its Effects On The New Way Of View Life887 Words   |  4 Pagescar and I was in need of a new vehicle. I thought to myself how lucky she w as. I was disappointed at myself for not being able to afford a newer car. I had to remind myself that me and her were not in the same situations. When she works, it goes straight into her pocket and she has family to help her out. With me on the other hand, I have to take care of my family and don t have enough family here in the U.S. to rely on. I believe I tend to commit these errors for many reasons. For some reasonRead MoreThe Relationship Between Politics And Hip Hop Music Essay1570 Words   |  7 Pagesits diversification since then has meant that there is no longer an all-encompassing ideology for the subculture. There are now limitless perspectives in political rap music, ranging anywhere from communism to libertarianism. In 1988 the album ‘Straight Outta Compton’ was released by NWA, sparking a discussion on appropriate subject matter for rap songs with its widely condemned, but nonetheless most popular track ‘Fuck Tha Police’. Although apparently intended as a social documentary rather thanRead MoreIs It Affects Me?1380 Words   |  6 Pagesaffects me. I don’t want it to, but it does. It affects me in part, because it is meant to. The man appears as if he is unhinged, they use the word taunting† to describe him. This man is being used to continue a narrative that people who support Trump are all rage infested lunatics. I am a firm believer that the one individual doesn’t represent all. There are unhinged people on both sides of the isle. There are also sane and balanced people on each side. When I look at this picture what I see isRead MoreEssay1404 Words   |  6 Pagesto Reply. The First Responder, if you will. Joke. But that is how this Topic unfold ed. I think I was just a little Off Of My Game when I selected General, instead of Political. A Climate Change or Global Warming related Topic. I should have been thinking Political. When I read this report about the researchers who are trying to quantify what they see as a linkage between a Cause--fatty acid emissions from cooking--and an Effect--cloud formation in the skies above London--I never thought of Al GoreRead MoreThe And Their Many Variations Essay1124 Words   |  5 PagesFeminisms and their many variations, have a bit of duplicity about them. Critiques of white feminists, straight feminists, and many other identities, create never ending us vs them conversations, leading many to view feminism as a dirty word that just pits people against each other; instead of working towards change. Yet, many of the activities performed by feminist groups, whether self-proclaimed as such or not, are going to be key in moving forward into the future. Feminisms that focus on the intersectionalityRead MorePlay Production Of 44 Plays Directed By Emily K. Harrison Essay1150 Words   |  5 Pageson the mistakes and successes of our nation s most powerful men, the writer s are reinforcing the idea that we all have a responsibility to participate in molding our future. The playwrights were very successful because they did not bore me with straight historic facts, they made me feel engaged by presenting serious and humorous portrayals of how each president had their ups and downs. I thought the play was successful in causing the audience to take interest in the election because the variation

Language and Politics for Public Policy- myassignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about theLanguage and Politics for Psychology and Public Policy. Answer: The essay deals with the issue of political correctness and language manipulation where one set of individual is in the position to ban words and language for the illusion of creating a coherent society. The argument is structured into three parts discussing the idea of swear words in a social context, the second paragraph deals with a how societys approach towards these words has altered and third a rationale on how manipulation of language is un-democratic and solely the privilege of one group over the other. Swear words are generally seen as taboo through which people express their strongest emotions. It is a relief button through which people channelize their anger or frustration. The demarcation between amicable and social words is no doubt social constructs which differ from one set of cultural values and social norms from the other. It is society who constructs and associates imageries and symbols with words and deems them as indecent, vulgar or regressive. According to Cavazza Guidetti, (2014) people who have acquired their language without systematic training or observation are prone to vent out their emotions with the usage of swear words. Language is a social variable and is therefore manipulated. Language manipulation is a politics on the part of state since language is considered as a symbol of power and authority shaping concepts, ideas and notions, exerting influence. If we consider politicians their language and discourse differ from private life to that of their personal. Imposing speech codes is not an answer to social problems but is merely an instrument of society to suppress the weaker section. The primary role of a language is to impart information, suppression of language only denotes the privilege over the dominant ideology over the lesser ones. There has been however a radical shift in the society towards their approach to social words and these words are grouped as hate speech consisted of prejudiced languages and vocabulary. Prominent figures opine that it is fundamental in eliminating gender or caste based discrimination and bringing forth a more positive change within the society. The language crusade has striven to change the approach of how one perceives the environment around. While criticizing the concept of swearing, one should realize the socio-cultural context, where linguistic politeness comes to represent a larger society. Therefore swearing can be viewed as a violation of the communitys right to harmony and dignity or in other words somebodys right to not hear it (Kramsch Vinall, 2015). Today swearing is seen as a deliberate act on the part of the people in order to demonstrate power and domination, where speaker is n control of the pattern of discourse. To end the discussion it can be firmly asserted that th e decision to use swear word is a matter of neurological, socio-cultural and psychological process. Swearing is sometimes seen as an act of purposeful reproach (Eccleston, 2018). Considering the facts, social constructs are indeed imposing and fascist (Philipsen Hart, 2015). With the elimination of offensive language a society can never construct the utopian world free of biasness towards caste, language rather it is ammunition used for mass suppression of feelings. A controlled environment would only accentuate the construed implications of swearing which can e used by an individual in multiple contexts. Imposing restrictions on language denotes the rise of speech community with a shared set of norms for communications, interpretation and deconstruction of speech (Kramsch Vinall, 2015). This could be used by the politicians to achieve common goal like suppressing democracy in a group, domination of the minority group and their culture and forcing others to abide by the linguistic norms in order to achieve common good. The inter-relation between language and ideology which is formed by a shared group of notions about the usage of language is highly individu alistic (Philipsen Hart, 2015). Language manipulation can lead to the birth of cultural vulnerability. Therefore it can be asserted that language domination would serve no great cause but lead to a capitalistic regime where the intellectual class in possession of materialistic values have the inherent right to introduce an atmosphere of falsity, where in the words of Friedrich, the other fellows ideas come to dominate the public discourse. Theorists have concluded that it is a form of mass domination and linguacultural ideology is the most conscious and dangerous form of domination which decides somebodys right to get offended (Govers Vermeulen, 2016). The stigmatization of language basically controls the flow of words that an individual produces from different perspectives (Newman, Hartman Taber, 2014). Therefore one can conclude stating that speech restrictions would serve very little but insinuate a reign of dissent and intervention into a person democratic rights. It should be stopped at the outset before it seeps into the subconscious part of every citizen. Reference List: Cavazza, N., Guidetti, M. (2014). Swearing in political discourse: why vulgarity works.Journal of Language and Social Psychology,33(5), 537-547. Eccleston, R. (2018). [online] Available at: https://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/features/warning-contains-coarse-language/storye6frg8h6-1111116556611?nk=a00ce3c15b2c780198bd3a12972c494d [Accessed 23 Apr. 2018]. Govers, C., Vermeulen, H. (Eds.). (2016).The politics of ethnic consciousness. Springer. Jay, T. (2009). Do offensive words harm people?.Psychology, public policy, and law,15(2), 81. Kramsch, C., Vinall, K. (2015). The cultural politics of language textbooks in the era of globalization.Language, ideology and education: The politics of textbooks in language education, 11-28. Newman, B. J., Hartman, T. K., Taber, C. S. (2014). Social dominance and the cultural politics of immigration.Political Psychology,35(2), 165-186.